Soy, I'll bump an inactive co-owner if you prove yourself by being better at the task of co-ownership. I'll put you as member for now, but if you remain active I'll make you co-owner.
That's the game that Yahtzee submitted to the magazine.
edit: The new review came out today, on Silent Hill: Origins.
I'm not a fan of the series. I've played a little bit of each, felt the feeling of the hopeless lunacy that is brought on by the gore and scary jumpy things, and I gotta say I'm not too keen on the theme. Don't get me wrong, I don't hate the series, and I don't hold anything against them, it's just that they're not my kind of thing (not my niche if you will).
There's my take on the game. Now here's what I think about the review itself.
In reviewing the review, I gotta say that I liked it much more than the previous mario one. The points that revolved around the unexplained
gameplay were few, but even they can be excused due to the fact that the covered gameplay would only be interesting if I truly cared about the game and its originality factors. Other (more general) gameplay, such as the weapons and the map, were quite into context, and yet common enough to comprehend his complaints.
Story and character-wise, it goes without say that if the Silent Hill series continue, they'll die and rot like the mario movement.
That's all. Let's hear your takes on this.