Originally Posted by saiyaman
It's not a counterargument. It's telling people not to underestimate the other side.
Vengeance was doing it for you? He posted his own replies and I believe that in the end we managed to agree, if not on all points, at least one point which was to say that I accepted NaruSaku points but at the same time defended NaruHina. This was something Vengeance seemed to agree on at least a little but you don't seem to agree. So what was that he was doing that you kept quiet on?
Of course you aren't Kishimoto. It's good that you're finally realizing that. Keep writing lines until it sinks in.
Who are you? You are a member named rokudaime_hokage and since you have been so generous enough to provide those "titles" I grant you BOTH of them.
what's the counter-argment of someone arguing that naruhina is not gonna happen? pretty much what you just said, dont you think?
"Im not trying to change your mind, Im just telling you dude... just to let you know" STFU.You even said that it would be pathetic to jump into narusaku conclusions.
which I believe is actually a type of fallacy if im not mistaken (cant remember the name right now)
I agree that you that you like to defend naruhina... that's pretty much it. Also i think vengeance didnt agreed with you in anything else.