zer0systm:
Quote:
|
This is just a quick excert from the biography of David Angell, the reason i am posting this here is to do away with your "no plane" claims this man was a celebrity, assuming his dissapearance is somewhat coincidental from the face of the earth when he was suposedly on one of the 9/11 flights is just moronic, the real means behind me posting this bio is to get the idea across that, every single person one those aeroplanes were people with background, they had a history, family, friends, it's a bit inconceivable that everyone who was on those flights just up and took off the day of those crashes.
|
The fact that these people exist does not mean that airplanes hit the Towers/Pentagon. In fact, as we examine the photographic/video evidence, it appears that the opposite is true. If I was a relative of Mr. Angell's, I'd be asking the government where the planes
really went, and why my relative's plane (Flight 11) was flying that day, despite the fact that it wasn't scheduled?
By the way, Angell has an interesting background. After graduating from a private Catholic college, he joined the US Army, where he worked at the Pentagon until 1972. His brother, Kenneth, was the Roman Catholic Bishop of Vermont. If anyone has done any research into the forces controlling the US Military/US Government/US Intelligence, they'll usually come up with the answer that it's the Vatican that wields the power in the USA and the world. Angell has a background in the military, Pentagon, mainstream media, and has close ties to the Roman Catholic Church, which he was trained by and which he belonged to.
I am not making any accusations against anyone with my interest in Angell's connections, but it is interesting how many of the 9/11 passengers have very interesting connections to the US Military, the media, or the Vatican.
Quote:
|
Sure. 767s aren't capable of cruising at 500+mph at that altitude, but they didn't have to cruise, they just had to descend (aerodynamic body + ~300,000lbs. + Gravity = fast ) and hit a building.
|
You won't descend that fast relying only on gravity. MIT, NIST, the British Air Force, FEMA, and FAA have all made estimates on the speed that the plane was traveling while it approached the Towers. What do all of their estimates have in common? They are all above 500 MPH.
Quote:
|
If you're planning on crashing your plane, I don't think you're going to be worrying about it "shaking itself apart" after a while.
|
You would be very worried about this, as a plane that has shaken itself apart is a plane that is obviously not going to be going into the Towers.
Quote:
|
All the "evidence" posted is retarded. Most of the links are just pictures of the wrecks. Saying "hurr hurr lyke a plane wouldn't do that" doesn't prove shit. Show what happened to the planes full of people that went missing if they weren't crashed into shit. You know, actual proof. Not "durr there should have been more smoke OMG THERE WAS NO PLANE LOLOLOL"
|
-It's not my responsibility to say what happened to the planes full of people. That responsibility lies with the people who told us that the planes/people ended up crashing into the WTC/Pentagon/Shanksville in the first place! The government and the newsmedia.
-Yes, saying "a plane wouldn't do that" is proof. If the government says that an apple is on Table IE, yet a photo shows an orange on Table IE, but no apple, then it is evidence that there is no apple. Similarly, when photographic/video evidence shows that the scene is completely inconsistent with an airplane, then we have to doubt the plane story. When video evidence contains clear signs of fakery, we have to conclude that it was fake footage.
-Of course there should have been more smoke/heat damage in the crater. A person at the scene said they smelled no jet fuel in the area, the photos clearly show that the hole/grass was not severely burnt (Even when smaller plane crashes feature big fires/smoke-plumes), and EPA groundwater tests concluded that none of it was in the ground. Remember, we were told that the plane crashed with over 5000 gallons.
Quote:
|
People need to learn to fucking think things out, seriously. Just think about it. What makes more sense? There was no planes and it was all made up, or the conspiracy theorists are wrong on this one? Think. Seriously. For fuck's sake.
|
Instead of looking at it like that, I follow the evidence. Please check out September Clues. It clearly demonstrates evidence of video fakery.
Quote:
|
Again. What happened to the passengers of those planes?
|
Ask the people who lied to you about it -- the government.