mewmew

dude, the theory fails even before the fire started. You people filtered out evidence in favor of your theory that there are no planes in the first place. about a hundred thousand people suddenly lose credibility to support your theory. is that supposed to be logical presentation of evidence?

also, you haven't even shown any "feasible" evidence that would solve the logistic problem of rigging two towers with lots of explosives within a set "realistic" time frame. it's one thing to make up a plan, but its another thing to execute it in "real life".

with you're way of selective evidence presentation (throw away the parts that doesn't support your theory-kind-of-inference), the photos "you" have selectively gathered hold no credibility against evidence found and assessed by innumerable "real life" professionals. Yours will be credited as pure speculative assumptions from a non-professional, non-first hand witness, observer from a distance. it's easy to find pictures and assess it within your own intellectual capacity by compositing your ideas with a pseudo-expert angle, but its another thing to truly understand evidence from a non-paranoid professional perspective.

__________________