Originally Posted by Miburo
I did produce facts. Like the fact that your argument sucks since the premise doesn't support the conclusion. Like Mal said, you never showed that it would be impossible for a building to collapse without having all the steel in the building melt. If you think about it, it's actually a ridiculously stupid thing to even suggest.
First of all let’s see what a collapse building looks like:
Now, let’s see what a controlled demolition looks like:
Lastly, see what happened to the WTC: