Originally Posted by Miburo
Like I said earlier, it doesn't matter since steel melting =/= structural failure. I think that perhaps the differences in building size and structure might have been a factor. And the fact that the Windsor Building wasn't hit by MASSIVE FUCKING PLANES could have played a role as well.
So what caused the Structural failure then? Are you suggesting that impact from the plane crash pulverized the entire steel structure from top to bottom?
I’m not the one making false assumptions and conclusions here. All my arguments are based to the report submitted by FEMA. It was there statement, where pointed out that it was the fire that caused the collapse. But I don’t buy their inconclusive story, for me it was just a cover-up story.
The steel that was used in the construction of the WTC were UL certified to withstand fire.