10-28-2009, 11:44 AM
|
#171
|
|
Genin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 53
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
Re: The 9/11 Conspiracy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mal
Miburo is neutral.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miburo
And like Mal said, I am neutral and I'm just taking the most logical position in regards to the subject.
|
Therefore, his statements are not accountable. Just mere opinions that doesn’t support either party. I have to admit, Miburo is logical.. he knows peer pressure.
Logical position? It is obvious that you are refuting both my statement and expert testimonies for the sake of your gang’s disposition.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miburo
Ironic that you would say that, considering how you totally bailed on that thermite argument you had going once Mal ruined your shit. The only people who haven't been taking everything into account in this thread are the conspiracy criers.
|
Explosive & Thermite use is a theory presented in order to explain the unusual collapse of the WTC Towers and WTC 7.
In relation to this, I presented clippings of photos, taken from actual 911 videos. Mainly, the visible explosion or “squibs” at WTC and the obvious crimping of WTC 7 before the collapse. Backed up with expert testimonies both structural engineers and demolition experts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miburo
Technically, all I claimed there was that the Windsor building wasn't hit by a massive plane and that structural failure doesn't equate to meaning steel melting. The first of which I'm sure you wouldn't dispute, and the second of which is obvious to anyone who isn't retarded (A=/=B).
|
Did you know that WTC Towers were designed to withstand multiple plane crashes? Did you know that WTC Towers were designed to withstand crushing hurricane winds? The impact of the plane crash and the level of fire at WTC weren’t enough to bring the towers down. Most of all the WTC 7 collapse remains a mystery.
I believe you have an inquisitive mind Mibs, that’s why you are not taking a definite side. Once again, view 911 as crime scene where you need a strong Trinity (Victim-Suspect-Motive) in order to solve the case. Not just hasty generalization and conclusion…most of all don’t just rely on your intuition.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mal
You still don't get why a Psychologist is the person to talk to about human behaviour? That level of stupidity should be a bannable offence.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mewmew
Solving conspiracies. NOBODY INVOLVED HAS ACTUALLY SPOKEN ABOUT IT. And I haven't even mentioned Philosophy in here LOL. TO DUMB IT ALL DOWN FOR YOU, as long as HUMANS are involved, it is the domain of PSYCHOLOGY.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miburo
There is no credible proof of a government conspiracy, so I don't believe it.
|
That Mental Scientist only gave his opinion about conspiracies. He has plausible statements when it comes to behavioral science. Like Mibs, the psychologist had an opinion that doesn’t even prove that there was no conspiracy.
Below, I will present the key conspirators and how they possibly pulled off this bonanza.
Earlier I raised this question:
1.) Who was the director of the company that provided the Electronic Security for WTC and Dallas Airport? *Both were involve in 911*
It was no other than the former President’s younger brother.
Also, Wirt D. Walker III a cousin of the Bush brothers was the CEO.
Was it only the security systems have been added for all those years?
..or it was also the wirings of a long awaited plan………
__________________
Last edited by Gansta_Ninja; 10-28-2009 at 11:55 AM.
|
|
|