Quote:
Originally Posted by Gansta_Ninja
Therefore, his statements are not accountable. Just mere opinions that doesn’t support either party. I have to admit, Miburo is logical.. he knows peer pressure.
|
Notice how your conclusion isn't supported by any of the premises you presented? Yeah, that's stupid. You should really try to break away from that trend.
I can fully justify anything I say. If I say an argument of yours is logically flawed then I can show you exactly how it is logically flawed. Unlike you, I can back up everything I type out. Don't be ridiculous.
Quote:
|
Logical position? It is obvious that you are refuting both my statement and expert testimonies for the sake of your gang’s disposition.
|
Again, stupid. Even if that was the case, and any one of us was just ruining your shit because it's the trendy thing to do or whatever, how would that make any of us wrong? It wouldn't. Regardless of my motive, if I'm shitting on your arguments then I'm shitting on your arguments. How about trying to actually provide a counter-argument instead of busting out the ad hominens? Oh shit, I bet I know why. It's because it's pretty hard to mount any sort of successful counter-argument when your initial arguments are horrible.
Quote:
Explosive & Thermite use is a theory presented in order to explain the unusual collapse of the WTC Towers and WTC 7.
In relation to this, I presented clippings of photos, taken from actual 911 videos. Mainly, the visible explosion or “squibs” at WTC and the obvious crimping of WTC 7 before the collapse. Backed up with expert testimonies both structural engineers and demolition experts.
|
Cut the "oh I got experts on my side lolol" shit. What experts? You haven't provided a single source throughout this entire thing. And whatever "experts" you do provide are probably not speaking for the majority in their field.
Also,
http://www.debunking911.com/overp.htm and
http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm
Quote:
|
I believe you have an inquisitive mind Mibs, that’s why you are not taking a definite side. Once again, view 911 as crime scene where you need a strong Trinity (Victim-Suspect-Motive) in order to solve the case. Not just hasty generalization and conclusion…most of all don’t just rely on your intuition.
|
Take your own advice.
Quote:
|
Like Mibs, the psychologist had an opinion that doesn’t even prove that there was no conspiracy.
|
Lrn2logic. You don't need to prove a negative. The person claiming that there is a conspiracy has to prove that claim. It's not anyone else's job to disprove something that hasn't even been proven yet.