Fandom Forums - View Single Post - Out with a snarky bang
View Single Post
Old 01-31-2010, 03:44 PM   #49
Miburo
Deos Fortioribus Adesse
 
Miburo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Valhalla
Posts: 3,543
Thanks: 34,417
Thanked 17,643 Times in 5,442 Posts
Miburo has a reputation beyond reputeMiburo has a reputation beyond reputeMiburo has a reputation beyond reputeMiburo has a reputation beyond reputeMiburo has a reputation beyond reputeMiburo has a reputation beyond reputeMiburo has a reputation beyond reputeMiburo has a reputation beyond reputeMiburo has a reputation beyond reputeMiburo has a reputation beyond reputeMiburo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Out with a snarky bang

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fayrra View Post
lol. Exactly. A better perspective of things. Meaning they are kind of ignorant. It has nothing to do with needing a life. So Zero reffering to that when saying "he needs a life", wouldn't make sense. Fucking duh.
I figured that was your main grip. His use of "get a life." I bet you feel that the phrase is overused, or that it's normally used for stupid reasons. Like someone telling another person to 'get a life' because the person would rather hang out at home and watch a movie over going to a dance club. Or for similar stupid reasons to mock someone like that. Right?

If that's the case, which I hope it is (otherwise you're just a total fucking moron), then normally I'd agree.

However, in this case, Zero's usage of the phrase is entirely justifiable depending on what definition he was using. For example, he could be using the definition found here:
http://esl.about.com/od/vocabularyre...xpressions.htm

And it would make perfect sense given the context. And since Zero is the one who used the phrase, he can claim he meant it using any definition that fits the context it was used in. And since Zero is a manly OH non-dipshit, he will likely claim to be using whatever definition fits.

Making you contesting his statement pretty stupid. Especially without verifying what he actually meant before doing so. It also fits the trend of you getting into debates based on semantics; something that is also pretty stupid.

And when you consistently do something, it's in no way erroneous to be labeled based off that. Like, someone who consistently teaches people shit can be called a teacher. Someone who consistently does stupid shit can be called stupid. See where I'm going with this yet?

You're dumb.
Miburo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Miburo For This Useful Post:
zer0systm (02-01-2010)