Re: New World Order
If I was presenting a theory, I could definitely at least provide a convincing and logical argument supporting it. Even if I couldn't definitively prove it. Just like that pro-life, pro-choice abortion shit. No side is 100% right, but they can each argue their stance to a satisfactory degree.
And if he doesn't have any clue what he's talking about, or is wrong about every single thing he has posted, then it would surely be easy for you to actually prove that claim.
If someone was saying something completely wrong, like that the earth was flat, I could easily produce undeniable evidence that proves him wrong. You haven't provided any evidence that he's wrong. No numbers or links or anything. I mean, if someone was that wrong, you'd think an intelligent person like yourself could do a quick google search and destroy him with actual evidence.
I know I could do it, if he was actually completely wrong about something anyway. Thing is, he's not. Sucks to be you, kiddo.