Originally Posted by SenninKorby
...Basically, any way you look at it this logic is completely invalid, and your argument is anything but sound. One, several characters with exactly the same traits in one physical characteristic are not remotely related. Two, NO PART OF YOUR "LOGIC" FOR KARIN BEING RELATED TO KUSHINA IS IN ANY WAY VALID, because there is NO ASPECT of comparison that shows any basis for a "theory" that they're related. Their physical traits aren't similar, their personalities aren't remotely similar, they don't come from the same regions, and most of all: NOTHING HAS BEEN ADDRESSED THAT WOULD RELATE KARIN IN ANY WAY TO NARUTO. DONTCHA THINK THAT MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, IF NARUTO HAD HAD ANY RELATIVES, IT WOULD BE RATHER IMPORTANT!?
I never said logic had anything to do with my theory. Not all theories are based on logic...mine are based on assumptions derived from bits of information revealed by the the way things are drawn and what is shown or not shown...and the way thing are written and what is said or not said.
Nonetheless...I get that the only "aspects of comparison" here are highly subjective and as such are virtually impossible to prove or disprove. So in essence, I have pulled a theory out of my ass...and not given anyone enough basis for my theory to squash it with hard facts.
Don't get me wrong...I do still think I'm right...but posting this thread the way I did was pretty um...fucktard.
PS...If Naruto has relatives...Kishi will make us wait for the info just like we've had to wait for every spoonful of information about Naruto's past and family to date.