Re: Suddenly, robots!
The 'cling to toys for life' statement wasn't related to my previous post. I moved on from that kind of argument. You bringing it back as an example to this matter in order to make me seem wrong is dumb on your part.
Even in my ''cling on to toys for life'' post in one of the previous pages the statement wasn't intended in a factual manner. It was supposed to be a sarcastic statement rather than a factual one. Read the whole sentence again and you would get it. I'am sure you would be perceptive of the content of sarcasm used in that statement.
I am the stone that the builder refused
I am the visual, the inspiration
That makes ladies sing the blues