Originally Posted by KillerNN
I've heard New Vegas wasn't as good from multiple people, why so?
Hard to say exactly. It just didn't seem as....epic as F3. There are differences in gameplay. For example, there are invisible walls in places there would have never been in F3 (and other numerous things). I also didn't get sucked into the storyline as quickly either, it took some time. But the trade off is, you get thrown into the action faster than F3.
Don't get me wrong, it's still a ton of fun, there are some definite good changes, and the game is certainly worth owning, but just seems a paler shadow of it's predecessor.