Re: Jesus, not the first
I don't actually define God, because I'm not making a claim with my lack of belief. I'm responding to other claims with logically justified skepticism, and talking in general terms for the sake of simplicity. Since the vast majority of people hold religious beliefs where god is defined as a supernatural omnipotent being of some kind, I use the term that is most likely to imply when speaking non-specifically.
You're not making an intelligent point here. If you want to talk about a different definition of god, then define it and I'll evaluate the claim of it's existence. The fact that you admit that faith isn't based on reason should make you shut the fuck up though. I'm saying that shit isn't logical. You agree and cannot prove your stance logically. There isn't anything left to discuss regarding the matter.