Originally Posted by LonelyNinja
"Theory" implies that there is substantial evidence to support it. Granted, conspiracy theories are usually total bollocks, but any "legitimate" theory has some form of evidence. Doesn't have to be particularly compelling, but then it can at least be argued that it's a theory.
Well there are some statements that are indisputable in this theory.
Namely the parts about the constitution.
I was in prison when I read this.
Did a bit of research in the law library about it, and it seemed to check out.
Didn't work when I tried it.
Posted it to see if anyone would recognize it more or less. HR did