Re: Us government's trick to violate civil liberties
^Pretty much what I would have written. But hey, age is just a number, right?
Anyway, the best reply to from the guy who likes debates is "hey, that's your opinion but that doesn't mean you are right" so I guess the only thing to point out is that "it doesn't make me wrong either" and leave it at that. I'll everyone else have a crack at psuedo-zen-philosophy-teflon man. I think I've made my point pretty, thoroughly. I really can't go any further with a guy who claims to be an idiot because he doesn't know anything thus nothing can be ruled out in a debate that by calling his entire philosophy bullshit (even providing some counter reasons of why) to receive such ambiguous, empty responses.
Substanceless arguments are not rebuttals. And since, by his own admission, he can't rule out that I'm 100% wrong, which means I must be right, to whatever extent, when means I win.
It's amazing to me that, unlike in the real world, people on the internet will wear "everyone thinks I'm a moron" as a badge of honour.