Originally Posted by almightywood
You conveniently missed the line following that that said:
To think that there is any sort of permanence to the knowledge you currently possess is simply a failing of the youth, believe it or not.
Thereby IMPLYING that it was a maturity issue, not an age issue.
People mature as they age it's true so they are related, and one could easily mistake one for the other.
I have met people I would term young who are in their 40s, and I knew people who I would've called old in their 20s.
He's the one who turned into which one of us is older, hence changing it into an age thing.
I used it as level of life thing, he used it like a number thing.
Simple as that.
Actually, I simply conveniently read exactly what you posted. If you weren't talking about his age and meant maturity then you shouldn't have specifically talked about age. It's as simple as that.
Not that it even really matters, since attacking his maturity in that situation is equally as retarded as attacking his age. ACt was neither being immature, nor is he young.
Oh whatever, by virtue of the very nature of my philosophy (or any other set of rules) I can completely tear apart anything that purposefully attempts to do the same to my beliefs (or me) and not be wrong.
It's pretty much the same thing as self defense clauses in the law.
It's illegal for you to pull a gun on me, but it's not illegal for me to pull a gun back on you.
That's, oh so hypocritical.
I can't even begin to fathom how you possibly think you weren't in the wrong to begin with when you went to tell me that my beliefs are wrong, since the only way you could prove that would be to completely prove they were absolutely impossible.
How many people have died over religion in this world, and you try and act like there is nothing at all taboo about beliefs.
If you were tell someone you disagree with their beliefs it would be one thing, but you don't do this, you flat out tell people they are wrong, which is why they aren't, and you are.
There is no possible way you could be right at this point unless there was no way you could be wrong. You are not discussing, you are not debating, you are only being rude if you don't have something more than an opinion to go on every single time you ever tell anybody they are wrong in their beliefs. Every person has THE RIGHT (a right is indisputable) to have their own beliefs respected.
Your stunning lack of respect has had me judge you to be lacking in character, as well of lacking in substance for refusing to address my actual points on my philosophy and instead resorting to this foolish trickery.
I bid good day to you sir, I am done talking to you.
Oh look. More made up rules.
Let me see if I follow. You making a statement = infallible opinion. A counter-argument = attack on your opinion, which is horrible and makes the person automatically wrong and disrespectful; analogous to assaulting a person and the denial of rights. Any counter-arguments you use against your opponents counter-arguments = self-defense and righteous.
I think it's official, (IN MY OPINION, which can only be challenged with ABSOLUTE TRUTH and must be respected since I have an indisputable right to have you respect my beliefs because you said so) you're the dumbest person on this forum. Quite the feat. Congratulations.