Originally Posted by Miburo
Actually, I simply conveniently read exactly what you posted. If you weren't talking about his age and meant maturity then you shouldn't have specifically talked about age. It's as simple as that.
Not that it even really matters, since attacking his maturity in that situation is equally as retarded as attacking his age. ACt was neither being immature, nor is he young.
Oh look. More made up rules.
Let me see if I follow. You making a statement = infallible opinion. A counter-argument = attack on your opinion, which is horrible and makes the person automatically wrong and disrespectful; analogous to assaulting a person and the denial of rights. Any counter-arguments you use against your opponents counter-arguments = self-defense and righteous.
I think it's official, (IN MY OPINION, which can only be challenged with ABSOLUTE TRUTH and must be respected since I have an indisputable right to have you respect my beliefs because you said so) you're the dumbest person on this forum. Quite the feat. Congratulations.
Oh whatever, quit pulling that stupid fucking trick out of your ass like it's actually logical.
By the very definition of it being a counter-argument (although counter-argument doesn't even fit since there was no argument on the other side, argument implies an attack as well) it is in fact an attack.
Whenever you use your opinion as an attack against someone you are no longer using it like an opinion. Someone's beliefs are never up for debate, only discussion, whether they are yours or mine, and there's no such thing as a counter-argument in a discussion.
How fucking hard is that to grasp?
So I am 100% correct due to defending myself to say you are moronic, deceitful, disrespectful, and completely wrong.