Fandom Forums - View Single Post - Us government's trick to violate civil liberties
View Single Post
Old 12-21-2011, 02:56 PM   #130
almightywood
Missing-Nin
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 275
Thanks: 37
Thanked 97 Times in 90 Posts
almightywood is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Us government's trick to violate civil liberties

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mal View Post
You're committing another logical fallacy, Equivocation. Just because the same word is used, doesn't mean the same meaning is used.

When you refer to beliefs being a person's character, you are using definition 1: "the aggregate of features and traits that form the individual nature of some person or thing." However, the character referred to in the definition for ad Hominem can be either of definitions 4: "qualities of honesty, courage, or the like; integrity." Or 5: reputation.

Ad Hominem is used in an attempt to disprove someone's claims by claiming the person is not be be taken seriously. Even assuming attacking someone's beliefs can be taken as an attack on their character, it is not Argumentum ad Hominem.

What was it you were saying about a backfire in proof?
I disagree that #1 doesn't also apply since saying something along the lines of 'that jew bastard' would fall under this as well and only fits under definition #1.
almightywood is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to almightywood For This Useful Post:
matta (01-23-2012)