Quote:
Originally Posted by Axiom
Nothing of a kind has happened in this thread. What has transpired here is people have presented reasonable arguments against your unsubstantiated hogwash, then provided proper evidence to reinforce their claims, that indeed what you are faffing on about is unsubstantiated hogwash.
|
I don't know what thread you have been reading, but I was asked to explain my viewpoint and I did. Explaining a personal viewpoint never requires outside documentation. And someone else producing outside documentation (even though it's from the internet and everything on the internet is suspect) doesn't change anything whatsoever about my viewpoint. So unsupported hogwash is a term that isn't even applicable to the point of this discussion.
Quote:
|
You do realize your "non-debate" is taking placing in a sub-section of the debate board right?
|
Funny how people keep bringing up this very insignificant point that i have invalidated several times.
These subforums are the only forums on this entire site that have rules that state "no debates here"
Quote:
|
I am much more willing to entertain the validity of a well thought out and properly reasoned claim, from someone who put in the time and effort to research and construct an argument of substance. Over the nonsensical ramblings of some guy who simply "mulled" things over for five minutes in his head.
|
I have come up with my philosophy over the last 25 years, not in five minutes unlike EVERY ONE of the responses to it. I never lay things out completely for anyone ever. (except the disable people that I take care of, they have a good excuse to need it) It's the same concept as giving a man a fish, or teaching him to fish. I put out the gist of it, and let interested parties work more out from there on their own. There's a reason there are so many tales with morals to them: Anything you learn because someone just told it to you ends up getting thrown by the wayside, but the things you figure out on your own stick with you.
I was and never will be trying to convince anyone of anything I have ever stated. I was merely stating what I believe, if you thought I was trying to convince you of it, well that just shows that you don't grasp what I am saying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Numinous
And? Opinions that are logically sound beat opinions based on baloney every time, is this some kind of news for you? Because this was established at the dawn of civilization, or else there wouldn't be civilization to begin with.
|
Derderder no opinion ever beats another opinion ever.
Quote:
|
The same happens with discussions, you moron, because you still keep using the god-awful colloquial term of debate when everybody else is using the academic. Keep up with the program or gtfo!
|
Once again, this is my thread, this DISCUSSION is about my words, my definitions are the ONLY ones that apply. Why don't you get with the program? Your lack of ability to comprehend words other than in your own words is why you are the biggest piece of shit on these forums. And (since you can't read) I didn't use the word discussion, I used the phrase "a discussion that is not a debate" and no, that never happens in a discussion that is not a debate, because at that point it would be a debate.
Quote:
|
What a pitiful bag of lies. Originality indeed is dependent on how much you know, because the odds of finding some intellectual territory unexplored is higher that way BUT you can have new, interesting concepts entirely based on logic.
|
I didn't say shit about originality, I said diversity. Diversity is much more likely to exist with the less you know. If everyone knows the same shit, how fucking diverse could you be. Either way I never said anything was dependent upon the extent of your knowledge, so what the fuck are you even talking about you incapable of grasping an idea know-it-all?
Quote:
|
Besides, what "new, interesting concepts" can come from Flat Earth Theory? Or creationism? Or fairy farts conducting planes instead of aerodynamics? I'd be more than happy to hear them.
|
I have no idea, you brought them up, therefore you are making a positive claim and I will ask you to produce documentation to support them, or admit you are wrong.
Quote:
|
Wow, you're stupid. You think that when the "file" is archived, we just throw the keys out to never open it again? Of course not, if suddenly God materializes for the whole world to see, I'm not going to be a moron and say "there's no such thing as a God!". No, I'll just open the archive, pull the file "I don't believe in God", switch it with "I believe in God" and send the former to the shredder.
|
Who gives a fuck if you throw the keys out? it's archived and is therefore not readily accessible, you fucking dumbshit! You won't reconsider it when related topics come up, only the topic itself. One day, when you get out into the real world instead of the twisted inane version of reality that exists in these forums, you may begin to grasp that you don't know everything, until then, don't bother talking to me again until you are ready to admit you are an idiot. Because you will have nothing worthwhile to say until then.
Quote:
|
That's what you should be doing, shredding files that not even baby Krishna cares about instead of hoarding them in pure fear of ever being wrong. It's okay to filter your information, that's what open-mindedness is all about: acknowledging, then processing, then having the information at hand in case it needs to be updated.
|
Quote:
|
Surprise levels: -3. Of course right or wrong don't exist in your philosophy, because that'd entail the possibility of being wrong, something you're too much of a pussy to own up your mistakes.
|
Everytime I have ever been wrong on this forum I have admitted it. Something that has happened only rarely. Everytime you all have claimed I was wrong without actually addressing what I was saying, I told you to shove it.
Quote:
|
Shut up with the hippie stuff, you maniac. No and Wrong are as good as tools as Yes and Right, because you cannot have one without the other. You can't be positive without the concept of negativism. You can't be an individual without the concept of a group. You are the one kidding yourself, pretending that if you don't care about the bad stuff it'll suddenly go away. No, there's only satiety with famine, there's only love with hatred, there's only peace with war, the moment one stops existing, the other stops making sense. No, wrong, famine, war, hatred are things we don't like, but that's how reality is and we have to live with it.
|
No and wrong have the POTENTIAL to be good tools, but their overuse makes them purely bad, much like hdl cholesterol.
Quote:
|
What's idgias? Even google couldn't solve that shit.
|
Why the fuck should I bother even telling you?
You would just come up with your own definition for it and ignore it anyway.