Originally Posted by Mal
Did you miss the "relatively speaking?" Of the circus of current candidates, Romney and Huntsman were at least not outright ridiculous on most issues. Compare anything Romney has said to Gingrich's goal to build a permanent lunar colony by 2020 and tell me his policies and ideas aren't relatively more grounded.
I didn't miss it. He has no stance on anything, nothing solid anyways, everything he says can change on a moments notice if he thinks it'll gain him more votes. He's obvious as hell about it, and up until he wanted to run for president had a completely different view on things.
He seriously talks himself in circles when questioned, he just comes off as very unintelligent. Even relatively speaking I don't think he should compare to Huntsman or Paul. Don't get me started on Gingrich that sad sack.