Quote:
Originally Posted by kael03
...right. Because an image that is clearly distorted by distance and angle is more accurate than an image that is directly behind the subject matter and level with the subjects.
|
That is BS!!! Distorted by distance??? Where the hell did that come from because the panel I use is merely a far out view of shisui and itachi which is the best panel to compare the heights of both considering its not ust an opening eye with everything squashed together... or looking from above or from the side of shisui's head...
Its a far out view that shows itachi and shisui on a cliff with a slight incline of the lip of the cliff, but on even ground because both are not on the lip... and only a couple feet apart... its almost exactly the same as the tobi panel... except those two were a foot closer then shisui and itachi were...
Your and so many others problems are that they think the panel is distorted because of shisui's actual height because they use the stupid first panel that is a complete contradiction of every other panel as their panel to draw all conclusions from...
There is no distortion, no angle, ect ect... The 5th panel on that page takes care of that by showing an above view that shisui and itachi are actually on level ground merely a couple feet from each other which the 4th panel did not... So there is no basis for all these stupid claims of inclines, angles or distortions considering there is two panels that explain everything which is even more then tobi's panel does and you take that as canon...So what is the actual problem with the panel I use...????