Originally Posted by Konnaha_yellow_flash
Where your from, if you make conclusions based on lack of evidence as in (it has yet to be completely revealed what happened in the mist back then) and still call it evidence thus insult someone because they will not agree your premature, "still lacking the evidence" for what actually happened version of PROOF... What do they call you... I think an arrogant 'f'orse 'h'ucker who tries to use a flashback that is not even about the topic of discussion as evidence... aroony'dooony...
I think I ball parked it...
Wow. You're not the one to talk about providing links that have absolutely nothing to do with your theory. But, instead of arguing with people around here, you should wait a week.