On the healthcare issue, you're kidding right? Both Paul and Ryan plans were literally announced days after Obamacare came out. As a whole, Ryan's plan is a more viable option than Obamacare. Ryan's plan comes with options. Obama's doesn't (same for Paul's).
On the energy issue... that's laughable. Wind is purely inefficient. The costs severely outweigh the benefits, and that's coming from liberal analysts, not conservative ones. Nuclear energy is the cleanest form of energy on the planet that is 100% efficient and effective (the only source of energy that is 100% in both categories). There are several ecologists that have stated that they have a means of filtering and purifying the water that would be used for the cooling system. Don't know how, because that's not my area of expertise, but if tree-hugging liberals say that it can be done, I'm actually going to put my money on it, since this would be a group that you would think would oppose it.
On the taxes, you can't break it down into a percentage. Simply put, the American citizen's taxes are deducted from their pay, sent to the IRS, and they do with it what they will. And depending on which state you live in, the true percentages are supposed to change, because of the varying and different taxes at the state level. Legally, an employer is supposed to provide proof of your pay and what amounts go towards taxes (as well as Social Security and Medicare). A taxpayer doesn't know what percentage of his/her individual taxes paid goes to. But the taxpayer can dig up the info through various means and take a look at the big picture budgets, but that would seriously be like reading 10 Obamacare bills (roughly 50,000 pages of budget work).
And about your house... you suck (that's a joke by the way for those that would try to start something).
This just got interesting.