Quote:
Originally Posted by Numinous
Oh, you mean since you denied with every single inch of your being that Banbutsu Souzou didn't exist, just for a few months later to acknowledge it? Color me unsurprised, it's obvious a complete idiot won't like when he has to admit his idiocy. Your reaction to Tobi=Obito must have been priceless, having to face the fact that even Kishimoto at his lowest isn't as braindead as you are.
|
I did not trust a single translation of one MH member considering every other translation said something completely different. But, I checked it myself and there was something called "creation of all things"... But it turned out the original translation was actually correct... Izanagi was Originally a jutsu for "creation" By being the practical Application of "creation of all things" that in the context of a ninjutsu/genjutsu... Is a technique that can create...
You and others however though cannot accept this. Even though banbutsu souzou is mentioned to be nothing other then what became the sage's creation Izanagi...
And Tobi=Obito was so close I should have gotten it, but the idea of tobi=obito blinded me to the obvious truth... Instead I suspected the only other uchiha with short spiky hair, hashirama-like power/abilities and a eye power never seen before...
Although I was wrong, I was so close just focusing on the wrong special uchiha out of the only two...
Quote:
|
... my god, your English grades couldn't possibly have been higher than a C in school. Clauses within a phrase, you know what that is? The "in that battle" is intricate to the clause of Hashirama getting the Kyuubi, there's no indication it transpires to the next clause (of Mito harnessing Kyuubi's power).
|
Kishi said that in that battle hashirama gained control then to gain it's power, Mito sealed it within herself. That is a complete sentence tying both actions together, as if they happened "in that battle".
Again, if kishi wanted everyone to know that hashirama gained control of the kyuubi in that fight, "BUT" after bringing the kyuubi back to the village, Mito sealed the it within herself to Gain it's power "FOR" the purpose of maintaining the balance of power... But that is not what was said...
Kishi said through Kushina to naruto "DO YOU KNOW ABOUT THE BATTLE BETWEEN HASHIRAMA AND MADARA? IN THAT BATTLE, HASHIRAMA GAINED CONTROL OF THE KYUUBI AND IN ORDER TO GAIN IT'S POWER, MITO SEALED IT WITHIN HE BODY BECOMING IT'S FIRST JINK."
And how do you suppose hashirama brought the kyuubi back to the village then held it in place until Mito was brought to the village to become it's Jink? Serious problem with that! Mito would of had sealed the kyuubi there when hashirama binded it with his wood dragon because he had no way to move it around, much less bring it back to the village.
Let's take an example that even a third-grader would understand:
Quote:
" At 4 PM, I bought a CD and, to listen to it in the best way, I played it on my PC."
By your complete lack of reading comprehension, the person making this example would be playing the CD on his/her PC when buying the CD, when anyone with a brain would say it's unknown, since the person could have a laptop and indeed play the CD when buying or have a stationary PC, meaning the person had to bring the CD home in order to play it.
But let's add the fact that we saw the person on the shop to buy the CD and we never, but ever saw him/her carrying a laptop. The most logical conclusion is that the person didn't play the CD when buying the CD. To say the person did play the CD when buying it is, you guessed it, ASSUMING s/he did play when in the original phrase it doesn't declare so, thus making an argument from ignorance. Now you understand why you point is completely illogical?!
Oh god, the idiocy, it burns! Do you know ANYTHING about narrative? It's already facepalm-worthy how Kishimoto feels the need to spoon-feed his readers with his silly aesops, it'd be exasperating if he started to spoon-feed us with exposition that'd make Randy Newman's lyric writing look subtle by comparison. Everybody that isn't an idiot understood that phrase just fine, so why cater to your preschooler reading capacity?
|
Blah blah blah!!! None of which disproved that kishi was actually saying that Mito sealed the kyuubi in that battle...
And you still have yet to explain why Mito would need to gain the power of the kyuubi if there was no reason to use it, as in to help hashirama.
Quote:
|
Jesus Christ, what some people are willing to relinquish to justify their sick fetish with a character that will cease to exist in 1~2 years...
|
I could care less about madara uchiha or hashirama senju. But, there are a couple examples in kushina's explanation of what happened in that battle which imply Mito was there and sealed the kyuubi within herself to help hashirama...
Not to mention, Obito knew that the kyuubi's power offers the ability to sense evil and he could of only learned that from Madara. And the only time madara could have possibly seen Mito use the kyuubi's power to learn such a thing. Was back then in that battle. Because madara became a Mermit, secluding himself to experiment on hashirama's DNA to revive the sage power, the RG.
SO he could not of possibly saw Mito in action with the kyuubi's power any other time and since he zetsu were not created until he gained the RG, long after mito was dead. Madara had to learned about the kyuubi's ability to sense evil from that battle...
The first. If you dare to advocate the latter when it transpires, oh boy, will you be in hot water.[/QUOTE]
LMAO, so you, who recognize more then anyone how much this manga contradicts itself constantly. Dares to Claim it could not be what would cause such an outcome simply because you want me to be wrong...
You my friend are becoming the personification of the word HYPOCRITE... You do it so damn much... and you know that contradiction is illogical as shit, (I suspect, but you do not even understand Logic so makes sense you would not understand false logic either). Anyways, yet, you still do it so much.