Originally Posted by kael03
I love how Kyf is claiming he impeachment better than people that have studied behavior for years, including going to school for said speciality, but refuses to show evidence that he also has similar, if not superior, knowledge.
Credentials/authority<<<<A claim supported by evidence and not an opinion like the papers that Failuious posted... Thus a so called layman with a reasonable argument>an authority with an unreasonable argument... Obviously....
You actually argue that being an authority completely negates the shit argument of basing a scientific paper of all things on OPINION
and not actual credible evidence gathered through effective experimenting which is ridiculous... Proving an appeal to authority fallacy thus unreasonable as ever!!!!
SO you support the paper of an authority where they give their opinion
of what the behavior is motivated by, based on personal interpretation as opposed to using effective experimenting to discern the actual reason and motivation of the babies behavior to actually prove or disprove whether a baby is showing altruistic behavior...
Can you understand the problem with the papers yet...
*Cough* SUPPORTING A CLAIM WITH AN OPINION AS OPPOSED WITH ACTUAL EVIDENCE *Cough*
Thus the problem with you guys argument
*cough* APPEALING TO AUTHORITY WHILE IGNORING THAT A CLAIM CANNOT BE SUPPORTED BY AN OPINION, THEREFORE, YOU HAVE SHOWN NO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE OF YOUR POSITION OF MORLA BEING HARDWIRED AT BIRTH LIKE INSTINCTS BY SHOWING ME PAPERS BASED ON OPINION SUPPORTED CLAIMS, AND THE PAPER IS DONE BY SCIENTIST TOO LOL *cough*
How can you not see the problem with the papers and your argument... Oh yea, forgot about that good ol'fashioned BIAS
... Which you guys always use in the special CONFORMATION
form to ignore contradicting evidence while just paying attention to anything that supports your position...
Something called Cherry Picking...