Fandom Forums - View Single Post - The 9/11 Conspiracy
View Single Post
Old 09-13-2006, 07:35 PM   #63
Ninja48
48 Cypherin' Ninjas
 
Ninja48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 305
Posts: 2,466
Thanks: 179
Thanked 636 Times in 249 Posts
Ninja48 is a splendid one to beholdNinja48 is a splendid one to beholdNinja48 is a splendid one to beholdNinja48 is a splendid one to beholdNinja48 is a splendid one to beholdNinja48 is a splendid one to beholdNinja48 is a splendid one to beholdNinja48 is a splendid one to beholdNinja48 is a splendid one to beholdNinja48 is a splendid one to beholdNinja48 is a splendid one to behold
Re: The 9/11 Conspiracy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miburo View Post
[insert everything you said] /conserving space in this post
Bleh, very valid points. The only motive that makes semi-sense is that everything was done for the money, but I can't prove that making money by pulling a 9/11 makes more profit than weapons trading, bribes, and whatnot. Without evidence, I lose, =\ lol. Also, about the probable/possible thing. True, there are many possible motives. However, the top possible motive is money. And who possibly could've made money off of 9/11? The military industry, is one. This rules out aliens, mole people, and possible flying turtles of course.

Oh, wikipedia outlined Loose Change. Here's their explanation of motives for pulling a 9/11:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loose_C....22Cui_Bono.22

Quote:
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...e/1227842.html
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html

I'll admit the only one I actually bothered reading was half the PM one, I just grabbed these off the Maddox page to tell the truth. ^^;

If you're going to post a pro-conspiracy theory link, try to post one that actually has a non-retarded motive for the goverment doing it. I still haven't found one of those, though I haven't really been looking since it's painfully obvious that Al Qaeda was responsible. >.>;
Gimmie some time (err, wait till I'm not lazy) to search for a pro-conspiracy link. It was a debunking of PM's debunking, and I found it interesting, lol. I just know that there has to be a debunking of a debunking's debunking. If that's proper english.
__________________
Ninja48 is offline   Reply With Quote