Conditional Statements

ShinobiKnight · 12-06-2007, 04:07 PM

Just wondering, if you make a conditional statement ending with an insult and someone else purposely fulfills that condition, can it be counted as a flame?
Ex:

**Ninja48** · 12-06-2007, 04:10 PM

If it's technically true, then yes. It's always a flame. Such is a fascist perspective.

Grimmjow · 12-06-2007, 04:23 PM

if they get offended then yea, it is a flame.

things would be a lot easier if people cut down on the insults.

ShinobiKnight · 12-06-2007, 04:30 PM

Well, if the person fulfills the condition after the statement is made, how could the user who made the statement predict that someone would fulfill it?

G · 12-06-2007, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by narutorasengan17

if they get offended then yea, it is a flame.

things would be a lot easier if people cut down on the insults.

You smell

Grimmjow · 12-06-2007, 04:58 PM

SK. not making the statement in the first place would keep you out of a situation like that one.

G. thank you.

**Ninja48** · 12-06-2007, 05:21 PM

I swear, I'm tired of the "lol dont flam and ur ok" bullshit.

Hypothetically, what if there was a rule against posting pictures of bananas? Whether or not it's easy to avoid posting those pictures have NOTHING to do with how fucking ridiculous the rule itself is.

Now, I know what you'll say. "rules against flamin isnt ridiculos lol ur crazy." And that would be totally missing my point. My point is that it's stupid to point out how easy the rules are to follow when we're discussing the rule's justification, because it has NOTHING to do with the justification. We're not pissed that the rules are hard to follow, we're pissed because they're not justified. Assuming that we're pissed, anyway.

EJ · 12-06-2007, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShinobiKnight

Just wondering, if you make a conditional statement ending with an insult and someone else purposely fulfills that condition, can it be counted as a flame?
Ex:
[spoiler-Trinidad
User 1: That was obviously sacasm. If you didn't notice, you're a moron.
User 2: i didnt notice OMFG FALME[/spoiler]

One question, why is trinidad on your spoiler, and to add on to that, what is a "FALME"?

RNB · 12-06-2007, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by narutorasengan17

if they get offended then yea, it is a flame.

things would be a lot easier if people cut down on the insults.

Things would be a lot easier if mods would cut down on the modding.

12-06-2007, 09:42 PM

^Word.

48 for fucking admin!

Also, I'd think that based on how flames have been handled in the past, that wouldn't be a flame and N17 may possibly incorrect on this one.

I mean, if that's how it works I could say something like "If you think 2+2=moo then you're pretty stupid" and then someone could just say "Hai guyz, lyke I totly think tat LOL!" and that'd be flaming? I swear, you guys have little rainbows, suns, and hearts on your tummies. Quit coddling crybabies. >.<;

ShinobiKnight · 12-07-2007, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RasenganAcv2

One question, why is trinidad on your spoiler, and to add on to that, what is a "FALME"?

lol. I don't know why I put Trinidad, I was kinda bored and the word popped into my mind. And I purposely misspelled the word "flame" to simulate User 2's terrible spelling and grammar.

12-06-2007, 04:07 PM	#1
ShinobiKnight Silberner Held Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Andorra Age: 20 Posts: 1,914 Thanks: 473 Thanked 84 Times in 56 Posts	Conditional Statements Just wondering, if you make a conditional statement ending with an insult and someone else purposely fulfills that condition, can it be counted as a flame? Ex: User 1: That was obviously sacasm. If you didn't notice, you're a moron. User 2: i didnt notice OMFG FALME __________________

12-06-2007, 04:10 PM	#2
Ninja48 48 Cypherin' Ninjas Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: 305 Posts: 2,466 Thanks: 182 Thanked 644 Times in 257 Posts	Re: Conditional Statements If it's technically true, then yes. It's always a flame. Such is a fascist perspective. __________________

12-06-2007, 04:23 PM	#3
Grimmjow SCHITT Join Date: Jul 2006 Age: 23 Posts: 3,127 Thanks: 275 Thanked 125 Times in 60 Posts	Re: Conditional Statements if they get offended then yea, it is a flame. things would be a lot easier if people cut down on the insults. __________________

12-06-2007, 04:30 PM	#4
ShinobiKnight Silberner Held Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Andorra Age: 20 Posts: 1,914 Thanks: 473 Thanked 84 Times in 56 Posts	Re: Conditional Statements Well, if the person fulfills the condition after the statement is made, how could the user who made the statement predict that someone would fulfill it? __________________

12-06-2007, 04:58 PM	#6
Grimmjow SCHITT Join Date: Jul 2006 Age: 23 Posts: 3,127 Thanks: 275 Thanked 125 Times in 60 Posts	Re: Conditional Statements SK. not making the statement in the first place would keep you out of a situation like that one. G. thank you. __________________

12-06-2007, 05:21 PM	#7
Ninja48 48 Cypherin' Ninjas Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: 305 Posts: 2,466 Thanks: 182 Thanked 644 Times in 257 Posts	Re: Conditional Statements I swear, I'm tired of the "lol dont flam and ur ok" bullshit. Hypothetically, what if there was a rule against posting pictures of bananas? Whether or not it's easy to avoid posting those pictures have NOTHING to do with how fucking ridiculous the rule itself is. Now, I know what you'll say. "rules against flamin isnt ridiculos lol ur crazy." And that would be totally missing my point. My point is that it's stupid to point out how easy the rules are to follow when we're discussing the rule's justification, because it has NOTHING to do with the justification. We're not pissed that the rules are hard to follow, we're pissed because they're not justified. Assuming that we're pissed, anyway. __________________

12-06-2007, 09:42 PM	#10
Miburo Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Conditional Statements ^Word. 48 for fucking admin! Also, I'd think that based on how flames have been handled in the past, that wouldn't be a flame and N17 may possibly incorrect on this one. I mean, if that's how it works I could say something like "If you think 2+2=moo then you're pretty stupid" and then someone could just say "Hai guyz, lyke I totly think tat LOL!" and that'd be flaming? I swear, you guys have little rainbows, suns, and hearts on your tummies. Quit coddling crybabies. >.<;

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode