Originally Posted by Keisok

If that's true, then explain why you're here.



If you believe in religious tolerance for other people, then why insult people because they have a different method of worship. That's a rather hypocritical thing you just said.



Interesting on how you came to the conclusion that they are either homosexual, or that they had bad childhoods. Perhaps they could have just decided to question what they see?



May I also remind you that the proof you are most likely refferring to is a religious text that has numerous passages that contradict each other as a whole?

There is proof on both sides, and people can interpret what they see of it. Sure, I'll probably voice my reasons why I disagree, but I'm not just going to shove my beliefs down your throat.

Originally Posted by Keisok

If that's true, then explain why you're here.



If you believe in religious tolerance for other people, then why insult people because they have a different method of worship. That's a rather hypocritical thing you just said.



Interesting on how you came to the conclusion that they are either homosexual, or that they had bad childhoods. Perhaps they could have just decided to question what they see?



May I also remind you that the proof you are most likely refferring to is a religious text that has numerous passages that contradict each other as a whole?

There is proof on both sides, and people can interpret what they see of it. Sure, I'll probably voice my reasons why I disagree, but I'm not just going to shove my beliefs down your throat.

Originally Posted by Miburo

I don't believe in it because it's illogical to believe in a something that has the same probability of existing as a flying spaghetti monster. Strike one.



Then get the fuck out of the debate section.


Demons and multiple gods are just as likely to exist as your god. You're the last person in this thread that should be calling anyone else an idiot. Strike two.


Or you're making a claim that you have yet to prove. If someone came up to you and said that flying invisible turtles existed you wouldn't say "Oh, okay, cool." Right? How about if it was written in some old ass book? Still no, I'd hope, correct? Know why? Because you'd be using logic there.

That's all I'm using here. You're saying some super magical entity with a zombie son exists, and the only "proof" you've provided so far to support this is a bunch of stories written around the same time people were saying dragons and shit existed. Why should I believe these stories? Oh, because magic man says so...in the stories. Oh, brilliant. Hi to you, circular reasoning. Forgive me for being skeptical, oh wise one. Strike three.



Haha, if that's the case then you should have no problem at all providing some credible proof to back up your claims then, yeah? This should be good. XD