9/11 "Controlled demolition" conspiracy theory DISPROVEN - Fandom Forums
Fandom Forums

Go Back   Fandom Forums > Indepth Interests > Debates Section > Conspiracy Theories

Conspiracy Theories Talk about your theories here.

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-28-2008, 06:29 PM   #1
Beikoku Rikujin
Join Date: Jun 2007
Age: 22
Posts: 92
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Beikoku Rikujin is an unknown quantity at this point
9/11 "Controlled demolition" conspiracy theory DISPROVEN

9/11 theorists say the twin towers were destroyed by "controlled demolitions" and that the proof is that the melting point of steel is below that which the fire was burning. That is NOT true. Here is the proof:


Temperature of fire, according to the wikipedia article about fire:

Typical temperatures of fires and flames
Oxyhydrogen flame: 2000 °C or above (3645 °F) [4]
Bunsen burner flame: 1300 to 1600 °C (2372 to 2912 °F) [5]
Blowtorch flame: 1,300 °C (2372 °F) [6]
Candle flame: 1000 °C (1832 °F)
Smoldering cigarette:
Temperature without drawing: side of the lit portion; 400 °C (750 °F); middle of the lit portion: 585 °C (1110 °F)
Temperature during drawing: middle of the lit portion: 700 °C (1290 °F)
Always hotter in the middle.

The melting point of steel, from the wikipedia article about steel:

Copper melts at just over 1000 °C, while tin melts around 250 °C. Cast iron—iron alloyed with greater than 1.7% carbon—melts at around 1370 °C. All of these temperatures could be reached with ancient methods that have been used for at least 6000 years (since the Bronze Age). Since the oxidation rate itself increases rapidly beyond 800 °C, it is important that smelting take place in a low-oxygen environment.

It is clear proof the 9/11 conspiracy theorist's statement on the matter IS WRONG.
Beikoku Rikujin is offline  

Old 02-29-2008, 03:13 AM   #2
Posts: n/a
Re: 9/11 "Controlled demolition" conspiracy theory DISPROVEN

No shit it's wrong, the 9/11 conspiracy shit are by far some of the most retarded conspiracy theories out there. Which, needless to say, is pretty damn bad.

We already have a silly 9/11 conspiracy thread going in this cesspool of stupidity though, no need for this thread. Just go into that one if you want to prove tards wrong. : )
Closed Thread

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.