flareofdragon

Err.. with evolution, we will learn that animals and other organisms can protect themselves by themselves, and we will be able to control many other objects. Plus, if we find out what made us, then we can make life on other lifeless planets, taking into account all of the weather condition and such.

Plus Evolution is needed for anatomy (sp?) and dissecting animals. If they were not similar, we would have a harder time finding out about these creatures.

Peregrin

... yeah, but what does the big bang have anything to do with that? I don't really believe any theories. The big bang seems the most sensible to me, so I embrace that one for now, but who knows? Also, why would we need to go to other planets? Answer: we're destroying our current one. If we spend more time thinking of ways to save our current planet, we won't need to worry about moving to a new one.

__________________
"The chief has spoken"
-Lord of the Flies

flareofdragon

.....

We could make life on other planets. Do you know how great that would be?

And big bang can tell how everything got us here. You said there wasn't anything that said that.

We are going to destroy ourselves... then Nature will come back and take over again. Provided there is something to take over of course.

swinburne188

here's one information about theory that i found from google:
"A theory is NEVER a fact, but instead is an attempt to explain one or more facts."
http://www.emc.maricopa.edu/faculty/...ookglossT.html
why can't creationism be called theory, it attempts to explain why we are here, but it can never be a fact until proven. and the fact that we arguing "where we come from" is because someone made a thread about this.

we are trying to go to other planets, that's why they build space station and exploration to mars and other planets. currently, the technology is not there yet for us to live on other planet.

Peregrin

A theory is based on observation, though. Creationism isn't an observation, really. And when you think about it, neither is the big bang. It's such a confusing topic... and it's getting off topic as well.

__________________
"The chief has spoken"
-Lord of the Flies

Tabris

well niether side has an extreemly strong argument, like you weren't there so you don't know what happened, we don't know if there was really a mass extinction, or if it was a world wide flood, cause we didn't see it.
evolution is not based on observations, it's based on faith. it's true, oh and i'm bringing my debate about evolution over here, cause, as some one mentioned the religion and god debate was not the right one for this arguement. I'll probably start running off examples and such, but i need someone to rebutle first, unless we're gonna have another screwed up debate without proper procedure... oh well.

__________________


C&H FTW

official co-owner of the digimon fan club!

flareofdragon

I really do not know how you people can be this ignorant.

Ok, there has been observation of species turning into another. Scientists have isolated a main population of a certain bird that was seperated into the Himalayas. Now the main population cannot breed with the isolated one. That is evolution at work.

Creationism cannot be a theory because you have to believe something that cannot be proven. Big bang can be proven because there is so much mathematics involved behind it. Of course its not absolute fact because it has not gotten rid of all the kinks. Therefore, Big Bang has a lot of support behind it (Mathematics has found many, many things before we actually found them, like Black Holes). The only thing that supports creationism right now is.... well nothing.

Unless you count the Bible. But not many people count that as an accurate historical document.

swinburne188

i think, theory is also a believe. if a theory is fully proven, then it's a fact, not a theory anymore. if people don't believe in certain theory then there's no point of arguing about it. until something is fully proven, then it's only a theory or assumptions or believes.

Typhoon

I believe in science and evolution over god and creation. As many of you said, science and the theory of evolution can be proven. It's basically an educated guess and it's a prediction came from evidence and reasoning. God and creation has no evidence and actual support. It's more like a story attempted to explain the unknown (kinda like a myth).

__________________


Proud and loyal Co-owner of the Konoha 5 FC

flareofdragon

No, Theory has a lot of evidence behind it, just not enough to make it a fact. That is why you hear the word "Theory" more often than "Law." "Law" is a theory that has not been defeated by opposition for a long time. (This is what you call fact)

Aburame Jumshaid

i believe a bit of both...

Majin Gaara

Oh boy...

Well I think that god created everything because something couldent just blowup and everything is just suddenly here( Big bang Theory)
They say that the earth was created by a bunch of gasses and atmosphere, well I really dont beleive that because there is absoulty no way something so unexplained can create bsomething so complexed. Same with evolution! If their was evolution than we(refering to the human race) would have already evolved into something more. Same with all other animals. And their is no way life could have existed more than 20,00 years ago on this planet because the magnetic force field of the earth was so strong that nothing clould even exist here.

Oh and typhoon, It has been proven that science is just a THEORY and not a fact. But they are teaching it asd a fact with is stupid bceause it has not even been proven.

__________________



Take The quiz yourself!

maro_1

i have my own gods so i say science and belief.

Majin Gaara

Weere and why would you worship your onw gods? lol

__________________



Take The quiz yourself!

Chibi Baka

im more of a science person, but i still have doubts sometimes dunno why though, but yeah science

__________________
My Site!!