A word from Kishi - Page 17

ask me anything · 03-03-2011, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillerNN

Not quite AMA, because somebody thinks a pie baked with "normal" apples tastes like shit, and someone or something would enjoy that crabapple pie.

If I ever meet someone who enjoys crabapple pies, I will change my mind.

AniMeFaN · 03-03-2011, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillerNN

Thats dumb.

If your dearest person was to fall, you would probably say "Fuck the 8 year old!" and grab the one you love. The lives are still fucking equal, even if not to you. I would grab the 8 year old solely based on the fact they haven't lived their life yet - not because his life is any better or worth more. Even if it was a snot nosed asshole brat, and Paul Newman, I would still pick the brat.

thats dumb lol, common. thats reality. the childs life is more valueable then the old person.

KillerNN · 03-03-2011, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AniMeFaN

thats dumb lol, common. thats reality. the childs life is more valueable then the old person.

Sorry to hear that bro.

I say that with absolutely no sarcasm.

AniMeFaN · 03-03-2011, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillerNN

Sorry to hear that bro.

I say that with absolutely no sarcasm.

ok so are you afraid to admit it sor something, you have a choice to save an 8 year old and an 80 year old. you would choose the person thats closest to you to save if there lifes are both equal. how are you going to tell me thats not the case. the fact that you along with everyone else would choose to save the 8 year old shows that the life is more valueable. actions speak louder then words, you want to say all lifes are equal thats fine but i call bs based on the way you would think and act in that situation

KillerNN · 03-03-2011, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AniMeFaN

ok so are you afraid to admit it sor something, you have a choice to save an 8 year old and an 80 year old. you would choose the person thats closest to you to save if there lifes are both equal. how are you going to tell me thats not the case. the fact that you along with everyone else would choose to save the 8 year old shows that the life is more valueable

I already said I would save the 8 year old, but is the loss of that 8 year old heavier than the loss of that 80 year old? I know I would choose the 8 year old because he hasn't lived life, and I would assume the 80 year old doesn't have too much time anyway. Doesn't make his life worth any less than the 8 yr old. At all.

AniMeFaN · 03-03-2011, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillerNN

I already said I would save the 8 year old, but is the loss of that 8 year old heavier than the loss of that 80 year old? I know I would choose the 8 year old because he hasn't lived life, and I would assume the 80 year old doesn't have too much time anyway. Doesn't make his life worth any less than the 8 yr old. At all.

if there lifes were equal you wouldnt even choose, you have the option of saving one and you would save the closest one to you. the fact that you are even thinking about which to save shows that they are not all equal

Shrike · 03-03-2011, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mal

Not necessarily. It is entirely possible for someone to have the goal of bettering society by way of killing select people without those people having committed any actual crimes.

Please explain. Give an example and then I can discuss it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninjalostboy95

I don't know if I'm portraying my thoughts right so correct me if I need it:

I mean "Better human" as in they are worth more than another human, as in it's a fact they are better instead of people's opinions(As in Person A>>>>Person B no matter what your opinion is.) I'm not talking about social status/class, their ability to do more than one can, or their morality. If I can think of an example, what do you call a bigger apple? An apple, right? Size doesn't matter since they both have the same characteristics of an apple and the only difference is size but that doesn't make it a superior, new class of fruit since they are still the same fruit. Did you get it or was I unclear?

First of all, size does matter, no matter what they told you.

And that's not true at all. Bigger apple is better because you will eat more then with the small one. Especially if it tastes better, then it sure as fuck is better.

One human is better then another human because he/she is. Just like one apple is better then the other. Doesn't matter if it's the same kind. Who gives a fuck anyway? You could say that a dog is a dog, and that is a terrible analogy.

Edit:

Quote:

Originally Posted by NN

You guys are looking at this from an opinionated and moral/ethic standpoint. NLB is saying all human life is equal. A heroin addict who dies from overdose is just as equal (in terms of life) as a billionaire who died from a heart attack.

Wattafak. So I shouldn't judge a guy on the forum because of this? Because that is how this started.....

KillerNN · 03-03-2011, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Wattafak. So I shouldn't judge a guy on the forum because of this? Because that is how this started.....

Haha, I don't know about that. I'm just referring to their examples.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fan

if there lifes were equal you wouldnt even choose, you have the option of saving one and you would save the closest one to you. the fact that you are even thinking about which to save shows that they are not all equal

Their lives wouldn't hold the same worth to ME, but overall they are still equal as humans. I don't think you understand.

Shrike · 03-03-2011, 09:00 PM

I know, but that's retarded for the judging people on forums stuff. Judging people anywhere even. You shouldn't judge because they are human, just like you? An hero, then.

AniMeFaN · 03-03-2011, 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillerNN

Their lives wouldn't hold the same worth to ME, but overall they are still equal as humans. I don't think you understand.

i dont understand, they are equal and there lives are equal as humans but you would choose which to save?

Axiom · 03-03-2011, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mal

Not necessarily. It is entirely possible for someone to have the goal of bettering society by way of killing select people without those people having committed any actual crimes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shrike

Please explain. Give an example and then I can discuss it.

Not sure if its what Mal was thinking, but I immediately thought of Hitler. In Hitler's mind, what he was doing, was for the betterment of the human race(his human race at least).

Road to hell paved with good intentions and all that.

KillerNN · 03-03-2011, 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AniMeFaN

i dont understand, they are equal and there lives are equal as humans but you would choose which to save?

Whoever is more important to me, or who I feel will have more impact.

AniMeFaN · 03-03-2011, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillerNN

Whoever is more important to me, or who I feel will have more impact.

you dont know either, you will never see either again. neither is more important to you. you choose the child because its life is more valueable then the elderly person. i dont understand why you would say all human lives are worth the same but act as if they are not.

KillerNN · 03-03-2011, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AniMeFaN

you dont know either, you will never see either again. neither is more important to you. you choose the child because its life is more valueable then the elderly person. i dont understand why you would say all human lives are worth the same but act as if they are not.

Apparently, you DON'T understand. I've already said why I would choose the child numerous times, you just have to read. And I'm not acting as if they aren't the same but saying otherwise, human lives are worth the same. You haven't answered any of my questions. Would the death of that child be any heavier (no, I'm not asking worse) than the death of the old man? No. Either way, a human is still dying. Accomplishments, failures, age, etc. doesn't matter, because a human being is still dying.

AniMeFaN · 03-03-2011, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillerNN

Apparently, you DON'T understand. I've already said why I would choose the child numerous times, you just have to read. And I'm not acting as if they aren't the same but saying otherwise, human lives are worth the same. You haven't answered any of my questions. Would the death of that child be any heavier (no, I'm not asking worse) than the death of the old man? No. Either way, a human is still dying. Accomplishments, failures, age, etc. doesn't matter, because a human being is still dying.

i dont even know what your questions mean or have to do with what were talking about. a human being is still dying so neither life could be worth more?

03-03-2011, 09:00 PM	#249
Shrike █▄ █▄█ █▄ ▀█▄ Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Silent Hill Posts: 5,177 Thanks: 7,917 Thanked 9,942 Times in 2,970 Posts	Re: A word from Kishi I know, but that's retarded for the judging people on forums stuff. Judging people anywhere even. You shouldn't judge because they are human, just like you? An hero, then.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)